In 1726, a twenty-year-old printer named Benjamin Franklin sat in his modest Philadelphia shop and conceived what he called his “bold and arduous Project of arriving at moral Perfection.” Around him, the young city hummed with possibility—merchants haggling over timber and tobacco, Quaker meetinghouses standing beside Anglican churches, newly arrived immigrants speaking German and Dutch alongside English. Franklin had fled Boston’s rigid hierarchy where his older brother had treated him as little more than property, and he recognized in Philadelphia’s bustling streets something unprecedented: a place where a man’s character might matter more than his pedigree. He approached self-improvement with the same methodical precision he brought to setting type, creating a system of thirteen virtues he would track in a little book with pages ruled into columns. Temperance, Silence, Order, Resolution, Frugality, Industry, Sincerity, Justice, Moderation, Cleanliness, Tranquility, Chastity, and Humility—each week he focused on one, marking his failures with black dots. “I was surprised to find myself so much fuller of faults than I had imagined,” he later wrote with typical self-deprecation, “but I had the satisfaction of seeing them diminish.”
What made Franklin’s virtue project revolutionary wasn’t the virtues themselves, which echoed Aristotle and scripture, but his assumption that moral excellence could be systematically cultivated like any craft. No divine grace was required, no noble bloodline necessary—just honest effort, careful observation, and steady practice. This was a profoundly American notion, born in a society where traditional hierarchies were dissolving and a printer’s apprentice could become a gentleman through merit alone. Franklin treated character development as he treated business: identify the goal, measure progress, adjust strategy, persist. When he struggled with the virtue of Order, perpetually losing papers and missing appointments, he didn’t abandon the effort but acknowledged his limitations with humor, remarking that perhaps a man with a good memory had an unfair advantage in appearing orderly. His approach transformed morality from an inherited quality into an acquired skill, democratizing virtue the way his adopted city was democratizing opportunity.
In 1732, Franklin launched Poor Richard’s Almanac under the pseudonym Richard Saunders, and with it, he began shaping American consciousness. Colonial families needed almanacs for practical information—when to plant corn, when high tide would come, when eclipses would darken the sky. But Franklin understood that people also hungered for wisdom, entertainment, and the sense that someone understood their struggles. He created Poor Richard as a character readers could love: perpetually scheming to earn money, henpecked by his wife Bridget, honest about his commercial motives. “I might in this place attempt to gain thy Favour, by declaring that I write Almanacks with no other View than that of the publick Good,” Franklin wrote in Richard’s voice in the first edition, “but in this I should not be sincere; and Men are nowadays too wise to be deceiv’d by Pretences how specious soever.” The candor was disarming. By admitting his desire for profit, Franklin demonstrated sincerity while simultaneously making his readers complicit in the commercial transaction. They bought the almanac knowing exactly what they were getting, and they loved him for it.
Poor Richard’s pages sparkled with aphorisms that burrowed into American culture and never left: “Early to bed and early to rise, makes a man healthy, wealthy and wise.” “A penny saved is a penny earned.” “God helps those who help themselves.” “Fish and visitors stink in three days.” “Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.” Franklin borrowed from Rabelais, Bacon, classical writers, and folk wisdom, but he polished each saying until it gleamed with American practicality. These weren’t philosophical abstractions but tools for surviving and thriving in a society where industriousness meant the difference between comfort and disaster. When Poor Richard observed that “Creditors have better memories than debtors,” every shopkeeper who’d extended credit nodded knowingly. When he warned that “He that waits upon Fortune, is never sure of a Dinner,” he spoke to a world where inherited wealth was rare and self-reliance essential. The almanac sold ten thousand copies annually by the 1740s—an astonishing figure in colonies with barely a million and a half people—and established Franklin as the voice of American common sense.
As Franklin’s wealth grew through the 1730s and 1740s, he began channeling his entrepreneurial energy toward civic improvement with the same intensity he brought to business. Philadelphia’s streets remained dark and dangerous at night, fires consumed entire neighborhoods, education belonged exclusively to the wealthy, and intellectual life was sparse. Franklin, embodying his virtue of Industry, founded America’s first lending library in 1731, reasoning that “reading was the only Amusement I allow’d myself” and that others deserved the same access to books. He organized the Union Fire Company in 1736 after watching helplessly as fire destroyed neighbors’ homes. He established the American Philosophical Society in 1743 to foster scientific inquiry, and created the academy that became the University of Pennsylvania in 1751 because he believed practical education should be available beyond the elite. Each institution reflected his conviction that entrepreneurship wasn’t merely about accumulating personal wealth but about building civilization itself. “The good Men may do separately is small compared with what they may do collectively,” he wrote, articulating a vision of prosperity as shared rather than hoarded.
Franklin’s virtue of Frugality—“Make no expense but to do good to others or yourself; i.e., waste nothing”—embodied his economic philosophy. When a friend suggested that Franklin’s advocacy of saving might hurt tradesmen’s businesses by reducing spending, Franklin countered that buying unnecessary luxuries eventually impoverished everyone. The buyer wasted resources, and tradesmen lost customers when those buyers went broke. True prosperity came from producing more than you consumed and investing the surplus wisely in enterprises that created lasting value. By 1748, at age forty-two, Franklin had accumulated enough to retire from active printing. He made his foreman David Hall a partner who would pay Franklin half the shop’s profits for eighteen years, generating income that freed Franklin to pursue science, diplomacy, and politics. This wasn’t retirement in the modern sense but liberation—the point of making money was earning the freedom to do work that mattered most.
The same year that Franklin flew his kite in a thunderstorm and proved that lightning was electricity, Poor Richard’s Almanac reached peak influence. In 1757, Franklin compiled the almanac’s best maxims into a single essay called “The Way to Wealth,” presented as a speech by an old man named Father Abraham to a crowd gathered at an auction. “There are no Gains, without Pains,” Father Abraham preached. “He that hath a Trade hath an Estate; and he that hath a Calling hath an Office of Profit and Honor.” The essay distilled Franklin’s gospel of industry and frugality into concentrated form, and it became one of the most reprinted pieces in American literature, translated into dozens of languages and read across Europe and Asia. Franklin had articulated something essential about emerging capitalism: wealth wasn’t a fixed pie to be divided but an expanding possibility created through diligence, innovation, and exchange. In a society where most people still lived as peasants bound to land they’d never own, this was revolutionary.
Yet Franklin never lost sight of his virtue of Justice: “Wrong none by doing injuries, or omitting the benefits that are thy duty.” He funded civic improvements anonymously, invented the Franklin stove that dramatically improved home heating but refused to patent it because “we enjoy great advantages from the inventions of others,” and believed others should benefit from his. His will included money held in trust for Boston and Philadelphia that couldn’t be touched for one hundred and two hundred years respectively, calculated to grow through compound interest into sums that would fund trade schools and infrastructure. When the trusts finally matured in the twentieth century, they had indeed multiplied into the millions, exactly as Franklin predicted. He understood that money wasn’t merely a personal resource but stored human energy that could be directed toward transformation spanning generations. The same mathematical principles that governed interest rates could be applied to generosity—small gifts steadily compounded over time could reshape society.
Franklin’s final virtue, Humility, gave him the most trouble, and he approached it with characteristic wit. He confessed that even when he’d conquered most other vices, pride kept sneaking back. “Disguise it, struggle with it, beat it down, stifle it, mortify it as much as one pleases, it is still alive, and will every now and then peep out and show itself.” He realized that even if he achieved perfect humility, he’d probably be proud of that accomplishment—a paradox that amused him. His solution was to at least adopt the appearance of humility by changing his language. Instead of saying “certainly” or “undoubtedly,” he trained himself to say “I imagine” or “it appears to me” or “I should think it so or so for such and such Reasons.” This wasn’t dishonesty but recognition that persuasion requires grace, that dogmatic assertion closes minds while tentative suggestion opens them. During the increasingly contentious colonial politics of the 1750s and 1760s, as conflict with Britain escalated toward war, this diplomatic style served him brilliantly in negotiating rooms from London to Paris.
The synthesis Franklin created between money and morality, between individual ambition and communal responsibility, became foundational to American identity. When Poor Richard advised that “An investment in knowledge pays the best interest,” he articulated the American faith that self-improvement and prosperity were intertwined rather than opposed. When he warned that “Beware of little expenses; a small leak will sink a great ship,” he taught the discipline that enables both financial security and personal freedom. And when he observed that “He that is of the opinion money will do everything may well be suspected of doing everything for money,” he drew the moral boundary that prevented capitalism from degenerating into simple greed. Money, in Franklin’s vision, was neither inherently spiritual nor anti-spiritual. It was crystallized human energy—the tangible form of time, talent, and effort—that could be deployed for noble or base purposes depending entirely on the character of its steward.
By the time Franklin died in 1790, he had helped transform thirteen fractious colonies into a unified nation, drafted the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, negotiated the French alliance that secured American independence, and witnessed George Washington’s inauguration as the first president. Throughout these epochal events, his virtues remained his guide—imperfectly followed but earnestly pursued. His wit stayed sharp to the end. When asked what sort of government the Constitutional Convention had created, the elderly Franklin replied, “A republic, if you can keep it.” It was vintage Franklin: practical, slightly skeptical, placing responsibility squarely on ordinary citizens rather than distant authorities. The same spirit animated his final wisdom about money and virtue—that prosperity without character was hollow, that freedom demanded discipline, and that the best investment anyone could make was in becoming a person of integrity who used their resources to serve others. In this uniquely American synthesis, the ledger book and the moral compass pointed toward the same destination: a life well-lived, useful to the community, and worthy of the remarkable democratic experiment Franklin had helped create.
Light Being ॐ 
Leave a comment